Julian Assange’s celebrity supporters stake reputations on situation
Raggle-taggle of ‘household names’ presented huge sums in the direction of WikiLeaks founder’s failed bail plea
The by now curious situation of Julian Assange took an additional weird twist yesterday when the courtroom learned that a raggle-taggle of “household names” were prepared to stake their status in his case, supplying sureties to the court using a complete worth of £180,000.
Regardless of claiming not to know Assange, the film-maker Ken Loach and the socialite and charity fundraiser Jemima Khan stood just before Westminster magistrates and offered massive sums in direction of Assange’s bail, although bail was later refused.
Supplying £20,000, Loach stated he did not know Assange aside from by status, but added: “I assume the perform he has carried out has been a public service. I assume we’re entitled to understand the dealings of people that govern us.”
Khan provided an extra £20,000, “or a lot more if will need be”.
Inside a statement later, she mentioned: “I make no judgment of Julian Assange as an individual as I have by no means met him. I am providing my assistance to him as I believe in the universal appropriate to freedom of data and our proper to become told the truth.”
On her Twitter feed very last month, Khan requested if Assange was “the new Jason Bourne”, a reference to your fictional motion hero developed by the thriller writer Robert Ludlum. The publish has considering that been deleted.
The journalist and filmmaker John Pilger, who also supplied £20,000, mentioned he knew Assange as a journalist and individual friend and had a “very high regard for him”.
The biggest donation of £80,000 was supplied by an unknown American relation who did not wish to be named since of anxiety for his security.
Patricia David, a professor, and also the top rated lawyer Geoffrey Sheen each offered up £20,000 surety on grounds that they had invested their lives fighting for human rights.
Exterior court Pilger explained: “This business in Sweden is really a travesty; an innocent man has a correct to become no cost.
“Having his freedom taken away is outrageous. Sweden ought to be ashamed. This isn’t justice – this really is outrageous.”
He extra: “Behind this he has produced plenty of enemies, the principal 1 being the warmonger, the usa.”
Howard Riddle, the decide at the courtroom in Horseferry Road, London, commended 4 with the sureties for his or her willingness to assist “out of concern for human rights” and with out personal expertise of Assange.


